Activity
From 01/30/2016 to 02/28/2016
02/26/2016
02/11/2016
- 05:39 PM Bug #1263 (Closed): [clang][atomics] Clang can't compile call of __atomic_add_fetch with 64-bit argument for 32-bit targets
- ~~~ cpp
#include <atomic>
#include <stdint.h>
int main()
{
std::atomic<uint64_t> a(0);
return ++a == ... - 03:57 PM Bug #1262 (In Progress): [objc] Tests starts failing after switch libobjc2 to upstream CMake-based build approach
- 03:56 PM Bug #1262 (Closed): [objc] Tests starts failing after switch libobjc2 to upstream CMake-based build approach
- ~~~
2016-02-11 10:57:53.311 UTC: BEG device test [crystax-issue995-objective-c-literals] clang3.7 +PIE: armeabi-v7a
...
02/09/2016
- 05:22 AM Bug #1010 (Closed): [clang] Thread-local variables are not supported
- Fixed by backporting support of emulated TLS from clang-3.8 (not yet released) to clang-3.7. It's much more difficult...
- 02:01 AM Bug #1010 (In Progress): [clang] Thread-local variables are not supported
- 05:03 AM Task #1260 (Closed): [build/tools] Switch DEFAULT_LLVM_VERSION to 3.7 and DEFAULT_GCC_VERSION to 5
02/06/2016
- 01:07 PM Task #1254 (In Progress): Add CMake-enabled tests
- 01:07 PM Task #1254 (Closed): Add CMake-enabled tests
02/05/2016
- 11:54 PM Task #1231 (Closed): Adopt android.toolchain.cmake to support CrystaX NDK
- "Done":https://github.com/crystax/android-platform-ndk/tree/master/cmake
02/04/2016
- 12:19 PM Support #1244 (Rejected): Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- Mario Li wrote:
> I delete libs and obj folders to make the .zip file smaller, this time I think I will success!!!
... - 12:05 PM Bug #1234 (Closed): 'fd_set' type not declared
- "Done":https://github.com/crystax/android-platform-ndk/commit/3bc93d1bba2510ce0114c764f828f52b7209b2fd. Will be avail...
- 11:51 AM Bug #1252: "Undefined reference to 'swab'" error when using GCC 5 and CrystaX NDK 10.3.1 x64 on Windows
- Thanks!
- 11:32 AM Bug #1252 (Closed): "Undefined reference to 'swab'" error when using GCC 5 and CrystaX NDK 10.3.1 x64 on Windows
- "Fixed":https://github.com/crystax/android-platform-ndk/commit/f86dbdb4c886508999a50da8eb165539a18e511c. Will be avai...
- 10:30 AM Bug #1250 (Rejected): on_exit implementation
02/02/2016
- 11:17 AM Bug #1252: "Undefined reference to 'swab'" error when using GCC 5 and CrystaX NDK 10.3.1 x64 on Windows
- Violet Giraffe wrote:
> P. S. I "fixed" the error by making my definition `extern "C"`, but I still wonder if there'... - 10:50 AM Bug #1252: "Undefined reference to 'swab'" error when using GCC 5 and CrystaX NDK 10.3.1 x64 on Windows
- P. S. I "fixed" the error by making my definition `extern "C"`, but I still wonder if there's something missing in th...
- 10:46 AM Bug #1252 (In Progress): "Undefined reference to 'swab'" error when using GCC 5 and CrystaX NDK 10.3.1 x64 on Windows
- 10:44 AM Bug #1252 (Closed): "Undefined reference to 'swab'" error when using GCC 5 and CrystaX NDK 10.3.1 x64 on Windows
- The original Google Android NDK doesn't provide the `swab` function, so I defined my own. After migrating to Crystax,...
- 10:47 AM Support #1244 (In Progress): Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- 05:02 AM Support #1244: Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- I delete libs and obj folders to make the .zip file smaller, this time I think I will success!!!
- 09:59 AM Support #1251 (Duplicated): Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- 05:01 AM Support #1251: Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- I delete libs and obj folders to make the .zip file smaller, this time I think I will success!!!
- 04:58 AM Support #1251: Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- Oh, no. I failed to upload the file again
- 04:51 AM Support #1251 (Duplicated): Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- The following question is the same as Support #1244, I can not upload the minimal example file, so I have to make a n...
- 03:19 AM Bug #1250: on_exit implementation
- Thank you for pointing this out to me. I try to compile gettext and now I realise that something goes wrong at config...
- 12:05 AM Bug #1250 (Waiting for feedback): on_exit implementation
- This is deprecated function. Even in glibc it's not recommended for use. See "here":http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/m...
02/01/2016
- 11:55 PM Bug #1250 (Rejected): on_exit implementation
- Hi,
libcrystax.so doesn't export on_exit() but atexit().
test case:
https://github.com/payload/crystax-tests/tre... - 12:43 PM Bug #1082: '__gnustep_objcxx_personality_v0' is not implemented for arm
- Fixed in "build #796":https://dl.crystax.net/builds/796/
- 12:18 PM Support #1244: Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- Mario Li wrote:
> I still can not find the minimal example, maybe something is wrong with Redmine?
Here is limita... - 06:33 AM Support #1244: Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- I still can not find the minimal example, maybe something is wrong with Redmine?
I have to upload the file to a netw... - 06:21 AM Support #1244: Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- Unfortunately, I can not find the file I just uploaded.
I try to upload the minimal example again.
- 06:09 AM Support #1244: Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- Dmitry Moskalchuk wrote:
> This macro is automatically defined if you use C++ compiler (i.e. @g++@ or @gcc -x c++@) ...
01/31/2016
- 11:50 PM Support #1244 (Waiting for feedback): Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- This macro is automatically defined if you use C++ compiler (i.e. @g++@ or @gcc -x c++@) . Obviously, you're doing so...
- 05:13 PM Support #1244 (Rejected): Which is the best way to define macro "__cplusplus" when I use crystax?
- !http://7xoj7k.com1.z0.glb.clouddn.com/16-1-31/8273847.jpg!
When I use crystax, I still can't use C11.
Finally I ...
Also available in: Atom