Activity
From 10/01/2015 to 10/30/2015
10/29/2015
- 04:12 PM Bug #1106 (In Progress): android-21 sysroot include stdatomic.h which seems to be wrong
- 04:11 PM Bug #1106 (Closed): android-21 sysroot include stdatomic.h which seems to be wrong
- Both gcc and clang already have own stdatomic.h, so having additional one in sysroot looks wrong. Also, it seems that...
10/27/2015
- 09:12 AM Bug #1103 (In Progress): [windows] Compiler run failed
- 09:12 AM Bug #1097 (Closed): [tests] Build of crystax-issue995-objective-c-literals failed on Mac OS X 10.7
10/23/2015
10/21/2015
- 01:48 AM Bug #1103 (Closed): [windows] Compiler run failed
- ...
- 12:06 AM Task #1102 (Closed): Upgrade sqlite3 to 3090200
- 12:04 AM Task #1101 (Closed): Upgrade ICU to 56.1
- 12:03 AM Task #1100 (Closed): Upgrade libpng to 1.6.19
- 12:02 AM Task #1099 (Closed): Upgrade libjpeg-turbo to 1.4.2
10/20/2015
10/13/2015
- 06:54 PM Bug #1037 (Closed): fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD, arg) failed with EINVAL on x86 platform
- "Fixed":https://github.com/crystax/android-platform-ndk/commit/270d0e394be36739bdc59bf3aadf9c57534ce647
- 06:04 PM Bug #1037 (In Progress): fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD, arg) failed with EINVAL on x86 platform
- 06:15 PM Bug #1097 (Closed): [tests] Build of crystax-issue995-objective-c-literals failed on Mac OS X 10.7
- ...
- 05:47 PM Task #1095 (In Progress): Implement package management system (crew)
- 05:47 PM Task #1095 (In Progress): Implement package management system (crew)
- 05:08 PM Feature #981 (Duplicated): Enable build of Boost.Python within Boost libraries
- 04:40 PM Task #1093 (Closed): Include Boost.Python into prebuilt Boost libraries
- "Done":https://github.com/crystax/android-platform-ndk/commit/c9b2839996d3ed686583ca51386226cc28be3395
10/11/2015
- 10:47 AM Task #1093 (In Progress): Include Boost.Python into prebuilt Boost libraries
- 10:47 AM Task #1093 (Closed): Include Boost.Python into prebuilt Boost libraries
- 10:46 AM Task #1092 (Closed): Integrate build of target Python libraries into NDK build process
- "Done":https://github.com/crystax/android-platform-ndk/commit/d996b39a5661c6f89a0e4725fa649b768879148a
10/10/2015
10/09/2015
- 03:02 PM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- Christophe,
Your questions are not related to this ticket, so lets move this discussion into "crystax-ndk":https:/... - 02:13 PM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- Hi, I got in great troubles since my last connexion,
> for some reason Finder tries to pack it into .cpgz, instead...
10/06/2015
- 11:21 PM Bug #1003 (Closed): [pwd.h] [struct passwd] member field pw_gecos is missed
- Fixed:
"platform/bionic":https://github.com/crystax/android-platform-bionic/commit/f6048d480c6c48c4fdceb783c7fbcfa...
10/02/2015
- 04:11 PM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- Christophe Delannoy wrote:
> I got the latest version (@...b689-darwin-x86_64.bin@) and any attempt to open it make ... - 04:05 PM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- > to enable [ARC], you should explicitly say about that adding @-fobjc-arc@ compiler option.
It is enabled by defaul...
10/01/2015
- 11:42 PM Bug #1082: '__gnustep_objcxx_personality_v0' is not implemented for arm
- https://github.com/crystax/android-vendor-libobjc2/blob/master/eh_personality.c#L500
- 11:41 PM Bug #1082 (Closed): '__gnustep_objcxx_personality_v0' is not implemented for arm
- 08:41 PM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- Christophe Delannoy wrote:
> Aïe aïe aïe, I spend many hours on this (in Xcode !): switched on the non-initialized ... - 08:20 PM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- Aïe aïe aïe, I spend many hours on this (in Xcode !): switched on the non-initialized warning flag, added @-Wall@ or...
- 12:03 PM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- Christophe Delannoy wrote:
> hem... just as a glance, Xcode has a really performing analyzer tool ((menu)>Product>An... - 11:57 AM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- hem... just as a glance, Xcode has a really performing analyzer tool ((menu)>Product>Analyze) that's does not complai...
- 11:46 AM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- > [...] If you enable optimisations (-O2), your example just crashes.
You are right ...
> > Thats annoying beca... - 11:12 AM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- Christophe Delannoy wrote:
> This code works perfectly, BUT... here, if @array@ is not initialised this comes to a... - 10:41 AM Bug #1079: Objective-C
- > In initial example you have unitialized temp pointer, but in last examle temp is initialized by zero. That's it.
...
Also available in: Atom